We present AdaPrivate-TS, a differentially private contextual bandit algorithm that combines Thompson Sampling with batched zCDP composition. Our key insight is that differential privacy noise inflates the posterior covariance in a structured way: adding Gaussian noise $N(0,σ^2 I)$ to $b$ yields sampling covariance $v^2 A^{-1} + σ^2 A^{-2}$, which Thompson Sampling interprets as increased uncertainty rather than pure corruption. Under event-level privacy (protecting individual interactions) with stochastic contexts, we prove that the privacy cost is only $O(\sqrt{d}\,\log T/\sqrtρ)$, logarithmic in $T$, because parallel composition amortizes noise across batches. Additionally, we explore privacy amplification via Poisson subsampling, which can reduce effective noise at stringent privacy budgets. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate: (1) AdaPrivate-TS achieves 93-99% of non-private performance at $\varepsilon \in [0.5, 5]$, outperforming UCB by 0.5-3.7% and up to 18% with tuned adaptive exploration at extreme $\varepsilon$; (2) privacy amplification provides additional 2-5% gains at low $\varepsilon$; (3) on MovieLens and Jester, AdaPrivate-TS achieves the best overall performance among event-level baselines, dominating at $\varepsilon \geq 2$; (4) under DP-SVD private features, TS's advantage over UCB grows to +11%, confirming noise-as-uncertainty is not limited to reward privacy. We provide rigorous proofs for privacy guarantees under interactive zCDP composition and comprehensive evaluation including convergence curves, 12-seed CIs, and DP-SVD feature ablation.

Thompson Sampling (TS) is widely used to address the exploration/exploitation tradeoff in contextual bandits, yet recent theory shows that it does not explore aggressively enough in high-dimensional problems. Feel-Good Thompson Sampling (FG-TS) addresses this by adding an optimism bonus that biases toward high-reward models, and it achieves the asymptotically minimax-optimal regret in the linear setting when posteriors are exact. However, its performance with \emph{approximate} posteriors, common in large-scale or neural problems, has not been benchmarked. We provide the first systematic study of FG-TS and its smoothed variant (SFG-TS) across fourteen real-world and synthetic benchmarks. To evaluate their robustness, we compare performance across settings with exact posteriors (linear and logistic bandits) to approximate regimes produced by fast but coarse stochastic-gradient samplers. Ablations over preconditioning, bonus scale, and prior strength reveal a trade-off: larger bonuses help when posterior samples are accurate, but hurt when sampling noise dominates. FG-TS generally outperforms vanilla TS in linear and logistic bandits, but tends to be weaker in neural bandits. Nevertheless, because FG-TS and its variants are competitive and easy-to-use, we recommend them as baselines in modern contextual-bandit benchmarks.

Thompson Sampling (TS) has emerged as a powerful algorithm for sequential decision-making, with strong empirical success and theoretical guarantees. However, it has been shown that its behavior under stringent safety and robustness criteria --- such as safety of cumulative regret distribution and robustness to model mis-specification --- can sometimes perform poorly. In this work, we try to address these aspects through the lens of adaptive variance inflation for Gaussian Thompson Sampling. Our one-line change introduces a time-and arm-dependent inflation factor into the sampling variance, and yields several compelling benefits. The resulting policy achieves provably worst-case optimal expected regret and worst-case optimal fast-decaying regret tail bounds, even in the presence of heavy-tailed (sub-exponential) noise or mis-specified environments. The policy is also robust to mis-specified noise variances. Beyond cumulative regret, we further demonstrate that our method ensures strong post-experiment guarantees: simple regret and estimation error per arm exhibit fast-decaying tail probabilities, contributing to more reliable and robust downstream decisions. Finally, we extend our policy to incorporate settings with unknown arm-specific variances and empirically validate the consistent performance of our approach across a range of environments.

Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) enables LLM agents to improve continuously from environment rewards, yet the resulting policies do not systematically accumulate reusable strategies that generalize across tasks. Modular skills can provide such reusable strategies, yet existing skill-augmented RL methods decouple skill creation from policy optimization, risking adopting skills that conflict with the evolving policy. Inspired by Anthropic's Skill Creator, we introduce RESKILL, an RL-in-the-loop skill creation framework that reconciles skill evolution with policy learning. RESKILL exploits the group-wise structure of GRPO to naturally embed three mechanisms with only marginal additional overhead: (1) an assertion-driven skill creator that diagnoses failures from past experience and proposes conditional, trigger-based skill revisions; (2) within-group rollout sampling that enables controlled comparison of skill versions, capturing which version best supports the policy's ongoing learning; and (3) Thompson Sampling with adaptive discounting to balance exploration and exploitation in skill version selection as the policy evolves. Across several domains, RESKILL consistently outperforms existing memory and skill-based RL methods, with the largest gains on unseen tasks. Analysis of the skill lifecycle shows skills being automatically created, tested, refined, and pruned as the policy improves, demonstrating reconciled skill-policy co-evolution.

Most exploration algorithms search broadly until uncertainty is resolved. When the action space is too large to resolve within budget, practitioners default to $\varepsilon$-greedy, which bounds disruption but spends its override blindly. We introduce \textit{Delight-gated exploration} (DE), a host--override rule that spends exploratory actions only when their prospective delight (expected improvement times surprisal) exceeds a gate price. This practical heuristic recovers a classical result: Pandora's reservation-value rule for costly search, with surprisal setting the effective inspection cost. Resolved arms exit the gate, fresh arms shut off above a prior-determined threshold, and selected linear-bandit overrides consume finite information budget. Across Bernoulli bandits, linear bandits, and tabular MDPs, the same hyperparameters transfer without retuning, and DE shows much weaker regret growth than Thompson Sampling and $\varepsilon$-greedy in the tested unresolved regimes. Delight improves acting for the same reason it improves learning: it prices scarce resources by the product of upside and surprisal.

Thompson sampling is a widely used strategy for contextual bandits: at each round, it samples a reward function from a Bayesian posterior and acts greedily under that sample. Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs), such as TabPFN v2+ and TabICL v2, are attractive candidates for this purpose because they approximate Bayesian posterior predictive distributions in a single forward pass. However, PFNs predict noisy future rewards, while Thompson sampling requires uncertainty over the latent mean reward function. We propose PFN-TS, a Thompson sampling algorithm that converts PFN posterior predictives into mean-reward samples using a subsampled predictive central limit theorem. The method estimates posterior variance from a geometric grid of $O(\log n)$ dataset prefixes rather than the full $O(n)$ predictive sequence used in previous predictive-sequence approaches, and reuses TabICL's cached representations across rounds. We prove consistency of the subsampled variance estimator and give a Bayesian regret bound that decomposes PFN-TS regret into exact posterior-sampling regret under the PFN prior plus approximation terms. Empirically, PFN-TS achieves the best average rank across nonlinear synthetic and OpenML classification-to-bandit benchmarks, remains competitive on linear and BART-generated rewards, and attains the highest estimated policy value in an offline mobile-health evaluation. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PFN_TS-36ED/.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Treatment allocation under budget constraints is a central challenge in digital advertising: advertisers must decide which users to show ads to while spending a limited budget wisely. The standard approach follows a two-stage offline pipeline - first collect historical data to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), then solve a constrained optimization to allocate the budget. This works well with abundant data, but fails in cold-start settings such as new campaigns, new markets, or new customer segments where little historical data exists. We propose Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits (BCCB), an online framework that learns which users respond to ads while simultaneously spending the budget, making treatment decisions one user at a time. BCCB unifies three components into a single sequential process: learning individual-level ad effectiveness, exploring users whose response is uncertain, and pacing the budget over time. We evaluated on the Criteo Uplift dataset, a large-scale advertising dataset from a real randomized controlled trial. Our key finding is a data-efficiency crossover: offline methods require approximately 10,000 historical observations to produce reliable results, while BCCB operates effectively from the very first user. Furthermore, BCCB exhibits 3-5x lower performance variance between runs, making it more practical for real campaign planning. Among purely online methods, BCCB consistently outperforms standard Thompson Sampling, budgeted Thompson Sampling, and greedy HTE estimation across all budget levels tested.

In this paper, we prove the first Bayesian regret bounds for Thompson Sampling in reinforcement learning in a multitude of settings. We simplify the learning problem using a discrete set of surrogate environments, and present a refined analysis of the information ratio using posterior consistency. This leads to an upper bound of order eO(H p dl1T) in the time inhomogeneous reinforcement learning problem where H is the episode length and dl1 is the Kolmogorov l1 dimension of the space of environments. We then find concrete bounds of dl1 in a variety of settings, such as tabular, linear and finite mixtures, and discuss how how our results are either the first of their kind or improve the state-of-the-art.

How can we make use of information parallelism in online decision making problems while efficiently balancing the exploration-exploitation trade-off? In this paper, we introduce a batch Thompson Sampling framework for two canonical online decision making problems, namely, stochastic multi-arm bandit and linear contextual bandit with finitely many arms. Over a time horizon T, our batch Thompson Sampling policy achieves the same (asymptotic) regret bound of a fully sequential one while carrying out only O(log T) batch queries. To achieve this exponential reduction, i.e., reducing the number of interactions from T to O(log T), our batch policy dynamically determines the duration of each batch in order to balance the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We also demonstrate experimentally that dynamic batch allocation dramatically outperforms natural baselines such as static batch allocations.